Talk:Macao, China

For what reason isn't the material here simply a footnote in Macau? I can see no viability as a full-fledged article. Alai 04:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it. Hong Kong, China, too. SchmuckyTheCat 04:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article discusses the official designation, its usage and its constitutional basis. It deserves its own article, and the material has not been moved to any article. Even if it were decided to be merge, foreign relations of Macau would, relatively speaking, be a much better destination. — Insta ntnood 10:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It should be called Macau, Macau instead of Macao, China!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.19.87.8 (talk) 03:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]